Legal Opinion

Tolliver v. Yeargan

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1983No. 82-5007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, District Judge.

This action was filed by Plaintiff, Dr. Charles L. Tolliver, against the University of Arkansas and various faculty and administrative personnel, specifically Dr. J.R. Yeargan, Dr. James E. Halligan, Dr. Charles Oxford and Dr. James E. Martin, alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §.§ 1983, 2000e and the Fourteenth Amendment. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that conditions and terms of his employment and compensation were discriminatory.

Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked and established pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. James G. CARIDDI, Appellant, v. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC., and Robert M. Wachter, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Adams v. RichardsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  5. Murphy v. Middletown Enlarged City School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Greenwood v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Charles L. Tolliver v. J.R. Yeargan James E. Halligan Charles W. Oxford James E. Martin University of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Rollins v. FarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API