Legal Opinion

Adams v. Richardson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 1973No. Civ. A. 3095-70PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

This is a suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and the Director of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW), complaining of alleged defaults on the part of defendants in the administration of their responsibilities under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq. (1970).

The responsibilities of the OCR include the administration and enforcement of HEW’s regulation issued pursuant to Title VI and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Alexander v. Holmes County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States of America v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Adams v. RichardsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API