Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Acker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1939No. 3363PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

This was a suit in trespass to try title, brought by appellant, Ramirez, against Mrs. Sophie Acker and her husband, William Acker, and W. C. Arnett and his wife, Lura Arnett, and Luke Wofford, and several others not necessary -to further mention here because they were finally disposed of in the trial, and hence not parties to this appeal. Ramirez sought to recover “Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of Tract No. 144, South Houston Gardens No. 6, Subdivision of the H. T. & B. B. R. R. Company, Abstract 1350, according to map or’ plat of record in Vol. 2, page 74 of the Map…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubb Diggs Co. v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Thompson v. MoorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. City of Waco v. RookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Cuniff v. Bernard CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Nerio v. ChristenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ramirez v. AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  4. Fauth v. First Nat. Bank of GranburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Garrett v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API