Legal Opinion

Fonte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 3, 1987No. 87-272PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORGENSON, Judge.

We affirm the order of the circuit court denying Fonte’s petition for writ of prohibition. Fonte had been arrested and arraigned on two occasions on two separate charges of driving under the influence. At the first arraignment, the trial court made no inquiry as to Fonte’s indigency or ability to retain counsel. At the second arraignment, the trial court stated, “If you want to hire a lawyer, do so, it’s up to you.”

Fonte’s trial on both charges was set for June 11, 1986, a date within the applicable statutory speedy trial period.1 On that date, the state for the first time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Blackstock v. NewmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Franklin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NaveiraSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Banks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. State v. Born-SuniagaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Birken v. ScheerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API