State v. Born-Suniaga
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The State appeals an order discharging appellee, Luis Born-Suniaga, pursuant to the speedy trial rule, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. The State charged appellee within the rule 3.191 speedy trial time period but failed to notify him of the charges until well after its expiration. The trial court dismissed the charges without affording the State the recapture period set forth in the rule. The court followed this court’s opinions in State v. Morris, 662 So.2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and Thompson v. State, 1 So.3d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), although recognizing that those cases…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- State v. NaveiraSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- State v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luis Born-Suniaga v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- ARSLAN ASLAM v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- ARSLAN ASLAM v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- DERRICK DEWON THOMAS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018