Legal Opinion

Andrews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2005No. 4D05-2322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.

Defendant moved for post-conviction relief based on newly discovered evidence in the form of an affidavit of a participant in the robbery for which defendant was convicted. Although the affidavit does satisfy the first requirement for newly discovered evidence, that it could not have been known by the use of diligence at the time of the trial, the trial court summarily denied the motion on the ground that it was inherently incredible. We affirm.

Defendant was charged, along with co-defendants Smith and Jackson, with robbery with a firearm, and found guilty. Jackson, who signed the affidavit in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. McLin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Patrick Placide v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Rolack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API