Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 7, 2004No. 3D03-2102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a Rule 3.850 motion filed by defendant-appellant Gerald Taylor, asserting newly discovered evidence. Under the circumstances of this case, the denial was proper.

Defendant’s newly discovered evidence claim is based on an affidavit provided by an alleged witness to the crime, a fellow inmate. The fellow inmate offered an affidavit which states that he saw the shooting which defendant was convicted. The affidavit states that both shooters wore ski masks and that the build of the shooters did not resemble the build of the defendant. The affidavit concludes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nordelo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. NORDELO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. NORDELO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API