Legal Opinion

Nelson v. City of Roanoke

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1931No. 5 Div. 825PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, X

This cáse being quasi criminal, on appeal to this court the rules requiring assignments of error and insistence of error in brief obtain, ánd errors not insisted on in brief of counsel for appellant are waived and will not be considered.

The evidence for the city tends to prove that defendant, within the corporate limits of Roanoke and within sixty days before the. beginning of the prosecution, violated an ordinance of the city, which ordinance reads:

“Ordinance No. 223. Section 1: Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Roanoke, that any person or persons…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Town of Valley HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Casteel v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. State v. PoagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API