Lopato v. Hayman
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Assumpsit.
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought upon a promissory note, by the payee against the maker.
After a trial in the Superior Court the jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff duly filed a motion for a new trial, alleging as reasons therefor the usual grounds. After a hearing upon this motion it was denied by the trial justice and the plaintiff then duly prosecuted his bill of exceptions to this court.
The plaintiff proved his case by producing the note and then the defendant introduced testimony tending to prove that the note was given without consideration and also that it…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Lisi v. MarraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- Fram Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- American Underwriting Corp. v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
- Matevish v. Ramey Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- DiBattista v. ButeraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.