Stephenson v. Osborne
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the Probate Court of De Soto county. Hon. J. B. Morgan, judge. 1. That articles of separation entered into between husband and wife, the latter contracting through the intervention of a trustee, are binding upon both,- Carter v. Carter, 14 S. & M. 61; Clancy’s Husband and "Wife,.399,400,401,402; Holies v. Hiell, 1 Cok i Ross v. Willoughby, 1-0'trice,"2; 2 East, 283; 1 Car. 36; 3 Bing. 349; 2 Barn. & Ores. 54; 3 Porter’s Ala.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Probate Court of De Soto county. Hon. J. B. Morgan, judge. 1. That articles of separation entered into between husband and wife, the latter contracting through the intervention of a trustee, are binding upon both,- Carter v. Carter, 14 S. & M. 61; Clancy’s Husband and "Wife,.399,400,401,402; Holies v. Hiell, 1 Cok i Ross v. Willoughby, 1-0'trice,"2; 2 East, 283; 1 Car. 36; 3 Bing. 349; 2 Barn. & Ores. 54; 3 Porter’s Ala. B. 614; Bishop on Marriage and Divorce, 614; Hutton v. Hutton, 3 Barr. (Penn.) R. 100. 2. That the policy of onr courts and statutes has been to extend and…
1Opinion of the CourtEllett, J.
The warrant of appraisement of the estate of Isaac Osborne, deceased, issued in February, 1866, commanded tbe appraisers to set apart to the widow and children such personal property of the decedent as was exempt by law. from execution. The appraisers disregarded this direction, and appraised all the personal property as belonging to the estate. Thq appellee, the widow of the decedent, filed exceptions to the action of the appraisers in this respect, and prayed that the matter be referred back to them, with instructions to set apart the exempt property, and the year’s provision as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Jackson v. LamphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Carson v. MurrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Mason v. HaileSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Rogers v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Garland v. GarlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
- Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Taylor v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Hill v. . KesslerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.