Legal Opinion

Texas, Office of the Attorney General v. Briseno (In re Briseno)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 19, 2017No. CASE NO: 17-70073; ADVERSARY NO. 17-7004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING THE STATE OF TEXAS’ EXPEDITED MOTION FOR REMAND

[Resolving ECF No. 4]

Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is a single motion, the State of Texas’ Motion to Remand, which was filed on March 7, 2017. [ECF No. 2]; [ECF No. 4] (amending [ECF No. 2]) (the “Motion”). The Motion states that Adelina Briseno and Alejandra Melendez (collectively, the “Defendants”) improperly removed the state court proceeding in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1452(a)’s prohibition against removal of civil actions by governmental units that are…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Topfer v. Topfer (In re Topfer)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. In re: Esco Oil Operating Company LLC; Everett Lawley v. Escopeta Oil & Gas Corporation, Danny Davis, Marvin Markman, Charles Robertson, Chittim Oil & Gas, LLC, and CST Operating, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2026
  3. RGV Smiles by Rocky L. Salinas D.D.S. P.A. and Rocky SalinasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API