Legal Opinion

Anest v. Audino

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 12, 2002No. 2-01-0599 RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

No. 2--01--0599

IN THE

APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

SECOND DISTRICT

BILL ANEST, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court) of Lake County.

Plaintiff-Appellee, ))

v. ) No. 97--L--787)

DAVID AUDINO, ) Honorable) Stephen E. Walter,

Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge, Presiding.

2Opinion of the Court · CallumJustice Callum

Plaintiff, Bill Anest, sued defendant, David Audino, for breach of a note and enforcement of a guaranty. Audino filed a counterclaim, alleging, inter alia , breach of fiduciary duty (count VI) and tortious interference with business expectancy (count VII). The trial court entered judgment for Anest on his claim and awarded him $130,000 in damages,…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory AncelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Graham v. MimmsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. E.J. McKernan Co. v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Hagshenas v. GaylordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API