Legal Opinion

Harriman Coal Corp v. Marylou Schoffstall

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 10, 2014No. 13-2495Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

Harriman Coal Corporation and American Mining Insurance Company (collectively, “Harriman”) seek review of an order by the Benefits Review Board (the “Board”) affirming an award to Mary Lou Schoff-stall of survivor benefits pursuant to the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.

I. Background

Mrs. Schoffstall’s late husband, Charles, worked at four different coal companies over a forty-year period. His final job was with Harriman, where he worked from 1997 through 2000. He had worked around…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Mary Lango, Widow of Andrew F. Lango v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Respondent/party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Morrison v. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Helen Mining Co. v. Director OWCPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Keene v. Consolidation Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API