Legal Opinion

Menasha Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided February 5, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle B. Boberts, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to set aside the Department of Revenue’s Order No. VL 74-362, dated July 31, 1974, in which the department affirmed, for yield tax purposes, the unit market values of timber species on plaintiff’s reforestation land immediately prior to harvest, as used in Harvest Permit No. 73-32B, dated November 29, 1973. The unit values determined by the department pursuant to OBS 321.310 and those pleaded by plaintiff are:

Species Defendant’s Unit Value, MBF Plaintiff’s Unit Value, MBF

Douglas fir, 3M or better $125.00 $78.50

Douglas fir, merchantable culls 20.00…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kem v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Equity Land Resources, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Highway Commission v. CallahanOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Westbrook v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riensche v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1980
  2. Carl v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976
  3. Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2007
  4. Dagg v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API