Legal Opinion
Gray v. Hartman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1946No. Civ. No. 3161PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This is an action by Delia Gray, as administratrix, on behalf of herself and adnlt heirs, for damages for the death of Berry Gray, her husband. A jury trial was waived.
On December 23, 1943, at 7 p. m. Berry Gray was walking in a southerly direction upon the easterly edge of an 18-foot oiled surface highway near Farmersville. There was no white line indicating the center of the road. The shoulders of the road were “grassy.” Defendant Harold Eugene Hartman was driving a flat-rack truck, seven feet in width, owned by his father, H. S. Hartman, in a northerly direction upon the east one-half of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Barry v. MaddalenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Conness v. McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- MacAulay v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia v. HeatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- H. Y. Minami & Sons v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950