Legal Opinion

J. L. Hudson Co. v. Thomas

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 24, 1934No. Nos. 6107, 6108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

These two cases grow out of similar facts and the issues are substantially the same. Consequently the court disposes of both in one memorandum.

Plaintiff issued its serial 5 per cent, notes to- the extent of $10',009,000'. Simultaneously it executed an indenture by virtue of which certain rights and obligations were imposed upon the trustee therein named for the note-holders. Action to recover upon the notes, prior to their maturity, in case of default, was thereby vested in the trustee, unless after such default and demand upon the trustee 'for action by it made by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Thompson v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Searle v. CramptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Gray v. School Dist. of Borough of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  5. State, Ex Rel. Gray v. AlwardOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryce v. National City Bank of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  2. First Nat. Bank of Indianola v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. Commissioners of Sinking Fund v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
  4. Brown v. RosenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Jennings v. Gary State BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API