Legal Opinion

D.H. Holmes Dept. Store v. Feil

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1985No. 83-1106PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellen Feil and Rebecca Vaughan sued D.H. Holmes Department Store, D.H. Holmes Beauty Salon, Holmes Glemby Now Salon, and Kree International for fraud and negligence in connection with treatments for removal of facial hair. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, assessing each plaintiff's damages at $75,000. The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for new trial, and the motions were denied. The defendants appealed to this Court from the final judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and from denial of their post-judgment motions.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Old Southern Life Insurance Company v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Kennedy Elec. Co. v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Harrell v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Burroughs Corp. v. Hall Affiliates, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Walker v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Surrency v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Crowne Investments, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. National SEC. Ins. Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. McCutchen Co., Inc. v. Media General, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Weninegar v. SS Steele & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API