Legal Opinion

McCall v. United States Marshal Service

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided January 4, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00443Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DARRON MCCALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:21-cv-00443-MHH-JHE ) BEN FOUNTAIN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Darron McCall filed this action pro se. He asserts claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). (Doc. 13). On August 26, 2022, the magistrate judge entered a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss Mr. McCall’s federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2). (Doc. 17). The magistrate judge also recommended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mark Blackburn v. Shire US IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API