Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Acme Sanitary Flooring Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 185-3228PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Eighth Supreme Judicial District. Action by Lee Harlan and others against the Acme Sanitary Flooring Company and others. Judgment for defendants, affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (203 S. W. 412), and the plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKittrell, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs in error against defendants in error, based on allegations that plaintiffs were induced by fraudulent representations made by defendants to buy 60 shares of the stock of the Acme Sanitary Flooring Company. The representations were alleged to have been that the company was fully incorporated, with a paid-up capital stock of $25,000, but more money was needed for working capital, and, if the plaintiffs would take $6,000 worth of stock, the company would have $12,-000 working capital. The plaintiffs were to receive treasury stock, which they thought they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Decker v. KirlicksTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Walker v. HaleyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Barkley v. GibbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smeltzer v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Gaines v. First State Bank of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Pittman v. Fort Worth Warehouse & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. City of Abilene v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Kugle v. Traders' State Bank of CleburneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API