Allison v. McClun
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Republic District Court. At the October term, 1886, this case was tried before the court and a jury, and the jury made the following findings of fact, to wit: “1. Did Isaac MeClun have any notes turned over to him, or left with him, on or after the first day of April, 1881, in which the above-named plaintiff owned an interest? Ans.: Yes. “2. If you answer the above in the affirmative, what interest did the above-named plaintiff have in said notes? A. One-half.
Read the full summary
Error from Republic District Court. At the October term, 1886, this case was tried before the court and a jury, and the jury made the following findings of fact, to wit: “1. Did Isaac MeClun have any notes turned over to him, or left with him, on or after the first day of April, 1881, in which the above-named plaintiff owned an interest? Ans.: Yes. “2. If you answer the above in the affirmative, what interest did the above-named plaintiff have in said notes? A. One-half. “3. At what date were the notes turned over, or left with the above-named defendant, and for what purpose ? A. April…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WaleNTINE, J.:
This was an action prosecuted in the district court of Eepublic county by John Allison as plaintiff, against Lydia J. McClun, guardian of the estate of Isaac McClun, insane, as defendant, for the recovery of one-half of $4,449.93, alleged to be due to the plaintiff as principal and interest on certain promissory notes executed by various persons other than those above named, and belonging to the plaintiff and to Isaac McClun jointly, and placed in the hands of Isaac McClun for collection; and for costs of suit. The defendant answered,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Rasmusson v. North Coast Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- National Council, Knights & Ladies of Security v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- DeWeese v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Revere v. RevereSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924