DeWeese v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Boulder County Court. Hon. E. J. Ingram, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The.plaintiff in error, hereafter called the defendant, was convicted of the violation of an ordinance of the City *141of Boulder which provides that no person shall, in said city,fraudulently sell, or offer for sale, any spoiled, diseased, or unwholesome provisions. The sale in question was made by a clerk between six and seven o’clock on Saturday evening. The provision sold was a piece of pork. It was lying on the counter; was selected by the purchaser, who took it home, and, according to his testimony, did not return it until between eight and nine o’clock on Monday following. The defendant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Gebhart v. BurkettIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Continental National Bank v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Garst v. Hall & Lyon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Barton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Canon City v. MerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- People v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- City of Canon City v. MerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958