Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cole v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1939No. 27378. En BancPublished

1DissentBeals, J.

(dissenting) — The question of the right of an employer to prosecute an appeal to the superior and supreme courts from an award in favor of his injured workman is one of great importance and difficulty. In the case at bar, as stated in the majority opinion, the claim of respondent Emma Louise Cole, the widow of the deceased workman, was denied by the supervisor and by the joint board. On appeal to the superior court by the claimant, the departmental order was reversed, and the claim remanded to the department for further proceedings. The employer has prosecuted to this court an appeal from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Crabb v. OlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Albrecht v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API