Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1966No. 23219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

“Whenever a motion for directed verdict, made at the close of all the evidence, is denied, or for any reason is not granted, a party who has” so moved may make a further motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or'the mistrial as the case may be. (Emphasis supplied). Code Ann. § 110-113 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 441; 1957, pp. 224, 236). Here, after a request for a continuance on account of illness of counsel for the plaintiff after examination of only two witnesses for the plaintiff, the motion by the defendant for directed verdict was not in order.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spivey v. BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Green v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Cowart v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. State v. Jerry CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
  3. State v. Jerry CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API