Allen v. Allen
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
641 A.2d 1332 (1994)
Millicent ALLEN
v.
Neil T. ALLEN.
No. 92-220.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
April 15, 1994.
Geoffrey Judd Vitt of Brooks, McNally, Whittington, Platto & Vitt, Norwich, for plaintiff-appellant.
Ernest P. Sachs, Norwich, for defendant-appellee.
Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.
ALLEN, Chief Justice.
The issue on appeal is whether the family court erred in ruling that the postnuptial agreement bars the plaintiff from collecting interest on the note. That is the only issue briefed and argued by the parties, and the resolution in this Court should be confined to…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Dooley; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Morse.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Kagen v. KagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Kleila v. KleilaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.