Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Marietta

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided July 14, 1961No. 238Published

1Opinion of the Court

Carson, P. J.,

The New Amsterdam ■Casualty Company filed an action in assumpsit against Wade H. Marietta and Margaret I. Marietta, defendants. Plaintiff seeks to recover monies paid for (a) court costs, (b) attorneys’ fees and (c) settlement, in defending an action in trespass, arising out of an automobile collision, brought by Patricia Marietta, defendants’ daughter, against James Gilchrist, at no. 117 May term, 1957. Plaintiff was the insuror of James Gilchrist.

Patricia Marietta, a minor on March 24, 1955, was injured by an automobile operated by James Gilchrist. Plaintiff, acting through…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Brill v. BrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Valdimer v. Mount Vernon Hebrew Camps, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Haines v. FitzgeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Campbell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API