Legal Opinion

Chenal v. Diersen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1947No. Gen. No. 43,878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Niemeyer

The claimant, hereafter called the plaintiff, filed in the probate court her claim based upon five judgment notes alleged to have been executed by the decedent, William Brauns. The executor of decedent’s last will and testament, hereafter called the defendant, filed an answer stating that “as to the fact of the genuineness of the signatures thereon, and the execution and delivery of said notes by said Testator, the Executor has no information, and therefore demands strict proof thereof, ’ ’ alleging that if the notes were made and delivered by decedent to the claimant, they were without a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Funk v. BabbittIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Burr v. BecklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cairo Lumber Co. v. LadenbergerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. American National Bank v. WoolardIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Allwood v. CahillIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of AndernovicsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Solone v. ReckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Riddle v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. In Re Estate of JensikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Schiff v. SchiffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API