Legal Opinion
Atzili v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 29, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2024-3365Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LIAT ATZILI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-03365 (CJN) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Several victims of the October 7 attacks against Israel claim here that the corporate entities that operate the Binance cryptocurrency exchanges assisted the terrorists who carried out those attacks. ECF 47. In particular, Plaintiffs contend that BAM Management US Holdings, Inc. and BAM Trading Services Inc. (collectively, BAM), as well as Binance Holdings Limited (BHL), are liable under federal…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.