State v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.
¶1 Dedrick Thomas appeals his eight witness tampering convictions, arguing that his conduct should be treated as one unit of prosecution for double jeopardy purposes. Because the unit of prosecution for witness tampering is an instance of attempting to induce a witness or person to do any of the actions set forth in RCW 9A.72.120, Thomas’s convictions are properly separate and do not violate double jeopardy. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 The State charged Thomas for the first and second degree assault of his girl friend, Victoria Montgomery.1 On January 3, 2007, Montgomery testified against Thomas on the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2010