Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Turk

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2015No. E060854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Peggy Ann Turk appeals from a domestic violence restraining order issued against her under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.) by a commissioner of the Riverside County Superior Court. The order prohibits appellant from posting negative and harassing communications online about her ex-boyfriend, plaintiff and respondent Peter Daniel Michaels. Appellant argues that the order is void because as a self-represented party, she did not consent to having a commissioner hear the matter. We agree.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. TijerinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. In Re FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elena S. v. KroutikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API