Legal Opinion

Everfresh, Inc. v. Goodman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1955No. Civ. 20732PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

As reflected in the record, it appears that plaintiff leased certain premises from the defendant in February, 1952, and subsequently, in response to a notice, quit the premises, leaving behind certain property which is the subject of the present action for conversion. Plaintiff retained a key and had access to the premises, and had informed defendant that an attempt was being made to sell the stored property in order to satisfy creditors.

Plaintiff’s president testified that the corporation “had no real interest in the equipment, financially, because it was all under lien to the Federal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Jones v. FeichtmeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Littleton (In Re Littleton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Newhart v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Davis v. TavasciCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Service v. TrombettaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API