Legal Opinion

Mann v. Golub

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1990No. 18376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Harry Mann appeals from a final order of the Circuit Court of Berkeley County entered April 13, 1987. Mann asserts that the trial court erred: (1) by converting his remedy from one seeking money damages to specific performance; (2) by designating the jury as advisory; and (3) by refusing to allow him to testify as an expert witness. We agree and remand with directions.

In 1975, Mann approached Sidney Blau, Sheldon Golub, and Howard Golub, three of the appellees, about forming a partnership to build a senior citizen housing project in Martinsburg, West Virginia. Mann explained that there was a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Mutual Cyclone Insurance v. O & a Electric CooperativeMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Stephenson v. AshburnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Rawls Bros. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mildred L.M. v. John O.F.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Louk v. Isuzu Motors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Amtote International, Inc. v. PNGI Charles Town Gaming Ltd. Liability Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1998
  4. Mid-State Automotive, Inc. v. Harco National Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
  5. Stacy Cales, et al. v. Theisen Brock LPA, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API