Legal Opinion

Garcia v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 5, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 13PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The appellant, Mary Garcia, acting as guardian ad Litem for her minor son, Daniel Garcia, filed a complaint against the City of Tucson to recover for injuries sustained by her son as a result of the alleged negligence of city employees. While playing in Oury Park, a city park, Daniel Garcia was injured when a heavy iron gate in the park fell on him.

At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the City of Tucson, invoking the doctrine of governmental immunity, made a motion for a directed verdict which was denied. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $10,000 and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Caldwell v. TremperArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Waid v. BergschneiderArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Medlock v. FlorianArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mosher v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Creamer v. TroianoArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Hing v. YoutseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. McClain v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Bogard GMC Co. v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API