Legal Opinion

Waid v. Bergschneider

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1963No. 7075PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

Appellants were plaintiffs in a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiffs received a verdict from the jury. This appeal is taken from an order granting the defendants a new trial on the issue of damages.

The trial court ordered a new trial because “there were improper remarks of the plaintiffs’ counsel which conveyed to the jury the fact that the defendants were insured as to their liability and these remarks influenced to some extent the amount of the verdict; in the absence of such remarks, the Court would not have granted a New Trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Zugsmith v. MullinsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Colfer v. BallantyneArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Big Ledge Copper Co. v. DedrickArizona Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sanchez v. StremelArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Peters v. BensonAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Aguilar v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Whitly v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API