Legal Opinion
United States v. Costello
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 15, 1992No. 92-C-576PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, Senior District Judge.
Presently before this court is defendant Kevin Costello’s motion to stay proceedings in the above-captioned action. The motion is opposed by both the government and defendant James Thompson. The motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The government commenced the above-captioned action [the Wisconsin action] on May 29,1992, to reduce to judgment its tax assessments against Mr. Costello and Mr. Thompson. Jurisdiction is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 1345 and 26 U.S.C. § 7402(a). On or about October 17, 1988, a tax assessment, pursuant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Tempco Electric Heater Corporation v. Omega Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,667 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Helen Echo HayduCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Igloo Products Corp. v. Mounties, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- Koch Engineering Co., Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Brower v. Flint Ink Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Rutlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994