Legal Opinion

Family & Social Services Administration v. Schluttenhofer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 2001No. 91A02-0010-CV-638PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant, Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA), appeals the trial court's grant of Appellees', Wayne and Chantel Schluttenhofer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Schluttenhof-ers"), Petition for Reduction of Medicaid Lien and Request for Declaratory Judgment.

We affirm.

ISSUE 1

FSSA raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: whether the trial court erred in reducing its Medicaid lien held against the Schluttenhofers.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts relevant to our disposition are as follows. On September 11,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. WorldCom Network Services, Inc. v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Department of Public Welfare, State v. CouchIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Guardianship of WadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Pedraza Ex Rel. Pedraza v. GrandeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Principal Life Insurance Co. v. NeedlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Provident Bank v. Tri-County Southside Asphalt, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Louisville & Indiana Railroad v. Indiana Gas Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Family & Social Services Administration v. SchluttenhoferIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Provident Bank v. Tri-County Southside Asphalt, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API