Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Woodbery

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Shackleford, C. J.:

This is an action of replevin instituted by the defendant in error, R. S. Woodbery, against the plaintiff in error, G. S. Gregory, in the circuit court for Gadsden county, to recover the possession of a certain mule and for damages. The declaration is as follows:

“Now comes R. S. Woodbery, plaintiff, and sues G. Scott Gregory, defendant, in this suit:

FIRST COUNT.

For that the defendant heretofore and before the commencement of this suit on the 6th day of September, A. D. 1905, wrongfully took possession and wrongfully and unlawfully detained one stud mule known as ‘Bluffer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pickett v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  2. Kelly v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  3. Ocala Foundry & Machine Works v. LesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Bisbee v. Board of County CanvassersSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  5. Fairbanks v. WitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BarllyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  2. Calmenson Clothing Co. v. KrugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Slater v. Breakwater Homes Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. The Florida Bar v. SibleySupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. Norman Babel Mortgage Co. v. Golden Heights Land Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API