Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Sibley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 25, 2008No. SC06-1387PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

995 So.2d 346 (2008)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Montgomery Blair SIBLEY, Respondent.

No. SC06-1387.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 25, 2008.

Rehearing Denied November 14, 2008.

Kenneth Lawrence Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, and Arlene Kalish Sankel, Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Miami, FL, for Complainant.

Montgomery Blair Sibley, Washington, D.C., pro se, Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review post-discipline motions filed by Montgomery Blair Sibley. The motions challenge the authority and power of some Supreme Court justices to act as constitutional…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Sawyer v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. State v. Gale Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Hawthorne v. WiseheartSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Hanson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In Re SibleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Estate of McCall v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2009
  4. STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEFFREY REININGERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Banuchi v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API