Legal Opinion

Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1987No. C9-86-1256Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellant Hubert Kaste appeals the final amended judgment and decree of dissolution based on the trial court’s unequal property division and its failure to divide the parties’ personal property. Helen Kaste filed a notice of review, seeking review of the trial court’s failure to grant judgment against Hubert for maintenance and health insurance arrearages. This is the parties’ second appeal from their dissolution, following this court’s remand in Kaste v. Kaste, 356 N.W.2d 64 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

The parties were married…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Marriage of Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Johns v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Egge v. EggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Kaste v. KasteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API