Legal Opinion

People v. McMillan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1922No. Crim. No. 639PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction herein of the crime of rape upon a girl of the age of fourteen years and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant contends that the court erred in denying defendant’s challenge for cause interposed to one of the jurors on the ground of actual bias. The juror was subsequently challenged peremptorily by defendant. He thereafter peremptorily challenged other jurors and exhausted his ten peremptory challenges, but it does not appear that any juror who served on the trial was unsatisfactory to defendant. The facts are similar…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. People v. KrompholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. SchaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. BloomIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. SellasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API