Legal Opinion

Skultety v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1950PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The defendant moves for an order transferring this action to the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to Section 1404(a) of Title 28 of the United States Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a), which provides that “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”

This is a suit brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. In the first cause of action plaintiff seeks to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jenkins v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Markantonatos v. Maryland Drydock Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Medich v. American Oil CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Dolly Toy Co. v. Bancroft-Rellim Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API