Legal Opinion

Lichtenberger v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Norval, J. Howard v. Chase, 104 Mass., 249; Moore v. Young, 4 Biss. [U. S. C. C.], 128. Jones, Chat. Mort., secs. 492-6, and cases; State v. Julien, 48 la.,.445; Bullene v. Smith, 73 Mo., 151.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

This cause is on error from the district court of York county.

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, on November 22, 1888, alleged that he had a special property in one bay horse, star in face, eleven years old, weight 950 pounds, named “Bill,” and also one gray mare, three years old, weight 800 pounds, named “ Topsey,” for the reason that the defendant on August 18, 1887, executed a chattel mortgage on said property conveying it to him, to secure two promissory notes of even date therewith for $25, due December —, 1887, and for $135, due August 18, 1888, with ten per…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newlean v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humpfner v. D. M. Osborne & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brown v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. J. I. Case Plow Works v. MarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Allen v. CernyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API