Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hogan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1896No. 6907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Dawson county. Tried below before Holcomb, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Post, O. J.

This was an action of replevin by the defendant in error, Ozial W. Hogan, who sued to recover possession of three horses, a wagon, and harness, and which resulted in the judgment in his favor in the district court for Dawson county, now before us for review.

It appears from the pleadings below that the plaintiff therein, on the 18th day of August, 1891, mortgaged the property in controversy to one Boyer as security for a note of even date therewith for $165, payable December 18, 1891, with interest from date at the rate of ten per cent per annum. By the terms of said mortgage, Hogan…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kay v. NollNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Newlean v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Garber v. Palmer, Blanchard & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Gillespie v. Brown & Ryan Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Manker v. SineNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Arcadia State Bank v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Alliance Loan & Investment Co. v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Feller v. McKillipMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Allen v. CernyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API