Legal Opinion

Jones v. Littlejohn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 15, 1996No. A96A1025PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Upon our grant of his application for interlocutory appeal, Roger Jones appealed the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment. Jones, defendant in the underlying action for damages arising from a two-car collision, contends that both he and Richard Littlejohn, plaintiff, were on active duty in the military at the time of the collision and, therefore, the doctrine of intra-military immunity bars Littlejohn’s complaint.

1. We are initially concerned with the jurisdictional implications raised by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). Specifically, 28 USC § 2679 (c)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Brennan v. FatataNew York Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Shirley McLaurin Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of Milton Stubbs, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Georgia Department of Defense v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Dudney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Fiocca v. KirschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API