Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Barry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 4, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

On June 16, 1929, the plaintiff as general agent of the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company entered into an agreement with Jerry J. Carroll, by the terms of which Carroll was to solicit and procure applications for life insurance in Dover. It was a condition of the bond that Carroll should “pay and discharge all his indebtedness to said General Agent as provided under the aforesaid contract, and any supplemental agreements thereto.” The contract required Carroll “to account, according to the first party’s instructions for that purpose, for all policies, premium and other receipts,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burlington Insurance v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. New York Life Insurance v. McDearmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Thomas v. MahanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1827
  4. Utter v. LeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Byington v. ShermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. v. Peerless InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp. v. Evansville Teachers Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Greenfield v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Great Western Hotel Management, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API