Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. Groover
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
It becomes necessary first to construe the petition. T|he suit being in one count, it must be deemed to be predicated on the theory that the stock was loaned to the husband to be used by him, as his own, for the purpose of borrowing money *34with which to buy his partner’s interest, and that he himself borrowed the money from the defendant and gave his note for it. This construction is given because the petition sets up two theories on which it is sought to charge the bank with making an illegal loan. The other theory is that the husband forged his wife’s name to a note as principal, and put up…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Ford v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Groover v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Morris v. CourtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Noras v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Jones v. CourtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Wilson v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.