Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 1998No. 97-1524PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This class-action suit was commenced by Katherine Barnhart and others on August 29, 1989. Barnhart alleged that a Fayetteville ordinance levying a sanitation charge on city residents to pay a bonded indebtedness owed by the Northwest Resource Recovery Authority (Authority) was an illegal tax and exaction. While the trial court ruled the charge was valid as a fee, we disagreed and held the surcharge was an illegal tax. See Barnhart v. City of Fayetteville, Ark., 321 Ark. 197, 900 S.W.2d 539 (1995) (Barnhart I). We further held that, in a waste-disposal agreement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Barnhart v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Meyer v. Riverdale Harbor Municipal Property Owners Improvement District No. 1Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Vandiver v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jones v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Stromwall v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Turner v. Northwest Arkansas Neurosurgery Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Jones v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Clinical Study Centers, Inc. v. BoellnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API