Legal Opinion
In re Prusan
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 2, 2010No. 09-49716-CECPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLA E. CRAIG, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Jeffrey S. Prusan (the “Debtor”) for sanctions against Ira and Barbara Goldberg (together, the “Goldbergs”) and Jonathan Goodgold, Esq. (together with the Goldbergs, the “Respondents”) pursuant to § 362(k)1 of the Bankruptcy Code for the willful violation of the automatic stay imposed by § 362(a). The Respondents oppose the Debtor’s motion. For the following reasons, the Debt- or’s motion is denied.
Jurisdiction
This Court has jurisdiction over this core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(b)(2)(A), and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor. Crysen/montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In Re RobinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Sucre v. Mic Leasing Corp. (In Re Sucre)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In Re FlackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- In Re SolisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re SeatonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- In Re EbadiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In re Ampal-American Israel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re VollUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.