Legal Opinion
United States v. Sundstrom
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 7, 1973No. 71 Cr. 922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
The defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, made pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (F.R.Cr.P.), is denied.
This case was originally assigned and tried without a jury before Judge McLean, commencing on July 20, 1972 and continuing with some interruptions until *1253July 31, 1972. The defendant was charged in two counts with unlawfully and knowingly failing, neglecting and refusing to report for an Armed Forces physical examination on August 12, 1970 (50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a); 32 C.F.R. 1628.16), and with unlawfully and knowingly failing,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Arnold G. SandbankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Dennis Adrian BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. SiracoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Mark WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Wayne Douglas KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. George Charles SundstromCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. David Baker PierceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Mason v. General Brown Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Mason v. General Brown Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Morton v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.