Legal Opinion

United States v. George Charles Sundstrom

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 27, 1973No. 395, Docket 73-1949PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the rather unusual question of whether a successor *861judge can enter a conviction after his predecessor in a non-jury trial has made detailed factual findings, but has left the verdict open in order to consider an essentially legal defense. Because we believe Judge McLean, the trial judge, had decided all relevant factual questions against appellant before his untimely death, and that Judge Cannella, the successor judge, thereafter properly found that appellant had failed to establish his “order of call” defense,1 we affirm the two judges’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Daniel Owen LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Mark WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Brennan v. GrissoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. Norman J. JacquesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lien Ho Hsing Steel Enterprise Co. v. WeihtagCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of AyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Bailey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. Michael A. CascianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Lien Ho Hsing Steel Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. Klaus WeihtagCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API