Legal Opinion

Jones v. CHC Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2.) Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment under CPLR 3213 was improperly granted. Such section provides for accelerated judgment when an action is based upon an instrument for the payment of money only. Plaintiff to prevail on a motion under this section must establish a prima facie case by proof of the instrument providing for the payment of money and defendants’ failure to make payments in accordance with its terms (Interinan Ind. Prods. v R. S. M. Electron Power, 37 NY2d 151, 155; McNeilly v Rogers, 58 AD2d 724,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Wagner v. CornblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Haug v. Metal City Findings Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Rickert v. Packet Facilities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. Chisholm Ryder Co. v. Munro Games, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Logan v. Williamson & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Guepet v. International TAO Systems, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. K.S. Finance Corp. v. A.R.B. Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API